No.8 there may be an idea on the part of some in the construction industry
that if you change " " on behalf of the fire service
if you now have 24-hour waking watch companies set up to focus on those buildings
if on top of that you're in a situation
where even the cladding that does get removed in some cases is being removed by a company
called Ryden who was responsible for the refurbishment Grenfell tower
what you see is the people who were part of the problem being offered
as part of the solution you're seeing Berkeley group
already saying that the a1 a2 should be pushed back on
what is this blank " "
that if you change " " on behalf of the fire service
if you now have 24-hour waking watch companies set up to focus on those buildings
if on top of that you're in a situation
where even the cladding that does get removed in some cases is being removed by a company
called Ryden who was responsible for the refurbishment Grenfell tower
what you see is the people who were part of the problem being offered
as part of the solution you're seeing Berkeley group
already saying that the a1 a2 should be pushed back on
what is this blank " "
⭕️
❌
💾
🖊 | ☑️ |
⭕️ | [[ AnswerCalc[0] ]] % | A | [[ AnswerCalc[1] ]] |
💾
✔️
[[ d.CommentTxt ]] |
" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwhDA6DXpE4 "
< | > |
🥇 |